The Private prosecution

Notice to authorities of mass murder in care homes by overprescription of Midazolam

APPLICATION FOR SUMMONS OR WARRANT FOR ARREST FOR ALLEGED OFFENCE (Criminal Procedure Rules, rule 7.2(6); section 1, Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980)

This is an application by xxxxxxxxxxx for the court to issue a summons against the proposed defendants. Applicant’s address: Email address: Phone:            N/A                                          Mobile: Alleged offences Misconduct in Public Office Conspiracy to commit Misconduct in Public Office Date(s) of alleged offence(s): 10th May 2024 onwards Proposed defendants Please see attached spreadsheet for contact details. Jonathan Lord Lucy Allan Health Committee Paul Blomfield Health Committee Steve Brine Health Committee Paul Bristow Health Committee Amy Callaghan Health Committee Chris Green Health Committee Dr Caroline Johnson MP Health Committee Rachael Maskell MP Health Committee James Morris Health Committee Taiwo Owatemi MP Health Committee Victoria Atkins Andrew Stephenson Helen Whately Andrea Leadsom Maria Caulfield Victoria Prentis Robert Courts National Police Chiefs’ Council Sarah Crewe Jon Boutcher Nick Dean Darren Martland Ian Dyson Simon Chesterman Richard Lewis Shaun Sawyer James Vaughan Mike Barton Dr Richard Lucas Ben Julian Harrington Rod Hansen Stephen Watson Julian Williams Scott Chilton Charlie Hall Lee Freeman Alan Pughsley Andy Rhodes Simon Cole Paul Gibson Andrew J Cooke Sir Mark Rowley S R Bailey Carl Foulkes Lisa Winward Susan Dungworth Craig Guildford Simon Byrne Association of Chief Constables Lauren Poultney Gareth Morgan Steve Jupp Tim De Meyer Giles York Jason Hogg Martin Jelley Richard Cooper John Robins Catherine Roper Dr Andrew Dickman Dr Amara Callistus Nwosu Dr Barry J A Laird Dr Catriona R Mayland Dr Ashique Ahamed Dr Sophie Harrison Dr Donna Wakefield Professor Mari Lloyd-Williams Dr Jason Boland

(1)  Consent to prosecute Do you need consent to prosecute?                                                                                              Yes    No

(2)  Previous application(s) Have you applied before for the issue of a summons or warrant in respect of any of the allegations you are making?                                                                                                                                                     Yes    No

(3)  Other proceedings Has any other prosecutor ever brought a criminal case against the proposed defendant in respect of any of the allegations you are making?                                                                                                 Yes    No

(4) Details of the alleged offence(s) CrimPR 7.3 requires that an allegation of an offence in an application for the issue of a summons or warrant must contain (a) a statement of the offence that (i) describes the offence in ordinary language, The offence is that from the 10th May 2024 onwards when they were put on notice, the accused by failing to investigate the correlation of approximately 20,000 to 30,000 excess deaths in the UK for several months in 2020, and the administration of Midazolam the accused: Committed Misconduct in Public Office. Conspiracy to Commit Misconduct in Public Office (ii) identifies any legislation that creates it; These offences are created by the Common Law against misconduct in public office and conspiracy thereof. (b) such particulars of the conduct constituting the commission of the offence as to make clear what the prosecutor alleges against the defendant. The accused being public officials, acting as Police chief officers, Members of the Parliamentary Health Committee, Government Ministers with responsibility for health, or senior employees of the NHS, wilfully neglected or breached their duty or misconducted themselves. The seriousness of the neglect or misconduct without any reasonable excuse or justification is sufficient to support a charge of misconduct in public office. The accused failed to make any proper investigation upon being notified by email on 10th May 2024 of the correlation between the administration of Midazolam and excess deaths in the UK. The excess deaths coinciding with the administration of Midazolam varied between 20,000 and 30,000 deaths for several months in 2020.

(5)  Summary of the circumstances The accused are all public officials, and individually and in conspiracy with each other, both contrary to the Common Law, have failed in their duty as holders of public office, to investigate allegation of mass murder. Allegations supported by strong prima facie general evidence, including statistical evidence and personal statements by family members and members of the medical profession. The mass murder was of defenceless aged and infirm and vulnerable people, isolated in care homes and hospitals, drugged and suffocated and tortured to death by means of excess administration of Midazolam. Evidence to be relied on: Email putting the defendants on notice Published statistical evidence Published expert evidence Published evidence to official enquiries Published videos by expert News reports Official documents describing the administration of Midazolam and the incentive process for administering it and the likely consequences Evidence from the United States where Midazolam has been administered as part of a means of execution

(6)  Application for warrant

(7)  Declaration.  See Criminal Procedure Rules r.7.2(6), (7). You may be asked to make this declaration on oath. To the best of my knowledge, information and belief: (a) the allegations contained in this application are substantially true, (b) the evidence on which I rely will be available at the trial, (c) the details that I have given in boxes (2) and (3) are true, and (d) this application discloses all the information that is material to what the court must decide.

Signed 8th November 2024

Decision – this record must be kept by the court I considered this application today [at] [without] a hearing. [The applicant confirmed on oath or affirmation the declaration in box (7).] [The applicant gave me additional information [the essence of which was:]][1] [The proposed defendant gave me additional information [the essence of which was:]][2] On the basis of the information contained in this application [as supplemented by the additional information described above]: (a) I [am] [am not] satisfied that the requirements for the issue of a summons are met [(b) I [am] [am not] satisfied that the additional requirements for the issue of a warrant are met][3] and I [issue] [refuse to issue] a [summons] [warrant] accordingly. My reasons are these: The court should give a brief indication of its conclusions.                                                                                                                                 Signed: ………………………………………..…………………………………………………………...… Name: ………………………………………..…………..…..… [Justice of the Peace]                                                                                                [District Judge (Magistrates’ Court)]                                                                                                [Justices’ Clerk / assistant clerk] Date: ………………………….

---

[1] Include a brief summary of any information unless it is recorded elsewhere.

[2] Include a brief summary of any information unless it is recorded elsewhere.

[3] Complete only if the application includes an application for the issue of a warrant.